top of page
Search

Cause-Related Marketing—Why Giving Back Sells (Especially When Guilt is Involved)

  • Writer: Mehdi T. Hossain
    Mehdi T. Hossain
  • Sep 8
  • 2 min read

ree

Have you ever bought something that made you feel good—not just because of the product, but because it helped someone else?

That’s the power of cause-related marketing—where companies partner with charitable organizations to support causes through your purchases. It’s often simple: "Buy this product, and a portion goes to X charity." Sometimes it’s "Buy one, we donate one." Regardless of the model, cause marketing works because it offers more than utility—it offers meaning.

Why do consumers love it? Because it helps reduce consumption guilt. It reframes spending as something virtuous.

Interestingly, this strategy is especially effective when consumers are about to indulge. Picture this: You’re debating between a fruit salad and a decadent chocolate cake. The salad feels responsible—you don’t need to justify it. But the cake? That’s where guilt sneaks in.

Enter cause marketing: “Proceeds from this dessert support children’s education.” Suddenly, eating cake feels a little more noble.

Research confirms that cause marketing performs best with non-essential or indulgent products, where consumers are actively seeking extra justification for their purchase. For essentials or health-oriented items, cause marketing doesn’t add as much value—those choices already feel “right.”

So, if your brand offers fun, playful, or indulgent products—snacks, beauty items, experiences—consider how partnering with a cause could add emotional depth to your offer.

Have you ever made a purchase just because it supported a good cause? Did that cause make you feel better about your choice?

We’d love to hear how giving back shaped your buying behavior.


Relevant references/citations:

Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 434-446.


Disclaimer: All thoughts and ideas presented in this content are original from the author(s) with appropriate attribution to research cited here. Generative AI was used to increase readability of the content.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page